Pureflow Bio

Pureflow Bio / Aquaculture engineering

Recirculating Aquaculture
Technology (RAS).

Design the fish, water and operating plan as one system. Explore the treatment loop, test your assumptions and build a clearer project brief.

Feed → dutyLive treatment-load studio
9 interfacesInteractive process explorer
24 checksSaved commissioning record

By Pureflow Bio, Mysuru · India
Engineering guide reviewed 30 October 2026

PUREFLOW / RAS EQUIPMENTPureflow Bio RAS skid equipment illustration showing vessels, connected pipework, pumps and controls
Integrated equipment illustration from the Pureflow library. The project drawing defines the supplied configuration.

Understand the complete plant

A fish-production plan. A water-treatment plan.

A recirculating aquaculture system treats culture water and returns it to the stock. Its useful capacity comes from the complete treatment route and the way it is operated.

Connect the production plan to the water-treatment plan: working volume, adult biomass, peak feed, source water, temperature and salinity. Then define what each stage must do under normal service, maintenance and interruption conditions.

The design question

What must this loop handle on its most demanding day?

A tank volume and a filter flow are useful inputs. Neither, by itself, establishes a complete farm’s production capacity.

Water

Reuse with a water budget

Plan make-up, wash water, purge and losses. Recirculation concentrates the need to manage what stays in the loop.

Operation

Control with measurements

Define the operating envelope and the readings that show whether the actual system remains within it.

Integration

Compact with service access

Put valves, screens, instruments and equipment-removal routes into the layout before the plant space is fixed.

Compare the operating model for the actual site
DecisionFlow-throughPondRecirculating system
Water routeContinuing source-water flowOutdoor volume with site-specific inflow and lossesTreated return flow plus planned make-up
Environmental dependenceSource-water conditions are a major inputWeather and pond ecology affect operationMore control equipment and operator responsibility
Waste handlingReview discharge flow and concentrationReview accumulated material and drainageCollect filter waste and manage purge water
Energy and staffingSite and gravity head matterAeration and husbandry depend on the methodContinuous treatment, monitoring and reliable response

Further reading: Victorian Fisheries Authority — RAS environmental management. Compare real site designs rather than assuming one method is universally best.

Interactive system explorer

One loop. Separate duties. Connected decisions.

Follow the process, then select a component to see its job and the question its specification must answer.

Separate wash waste → sludge handlingPrepared make-up waterOPTIONAL SIDE-STREAM / SUPPORT DUTIESPolishing · temperature · nitrate management1Culture tanks2Solids separation3Biological treatment4Carbon dioxide removal5Balance and make-up6Circulation7Oxygen transfer8Selected disinfection9Monitor the whole loopDO · flow · level · temperature · power · alarm deliveryPUREFLOW BIO / PROCESS CONCEPT · NOT A HYDRAULIC LEVEL DRAWING

Process concept, not a construction drawing. Final stage order, side-streams, operating levels and bypass arrangements are project-specific. On a phone, swipe inside the drawing.

1

Culture tanks

Feed-to-treatment planning studio

Start with the load. See what it asks of the loop.

Compare hydraulic demand with the dissolved-load duty. Every assumption is visible, and the result can travel with your enquiry.

Build the operating scenario

Illustrative starting values. Replace them with the project’s design basis.

Edit treatment assumptions

These are calculation inputs, not Pureflow performance claims. Media rates and transfer efficiency must be agreed for the selected equipment and water conditions.

Your live design brief

125 m³/h

Feed used · kg/day
TAN-N · kg/day
Oxygen demand · kg/day
CO₂ load · kg/day
Dry solids · kg/day
Media · m³
Reactor working volume · m³
Alkalinity demand · kg CaCO₃ eq/day

Hydraulic comparison only. Biological treatment, peak gas demand, mesh-specific duty and system head require separate review.

Calculation method, units and the worked example
Daily feed = biomass × daily ration / 100 (when selected)
TAN-N kg/day = feed kg/day × entered g TAN-N/kg feed / 1,000
Turnover flow m³/h = working tank volume / turnover time
TAN-N transport flow m³/h = TAN-N kg/day × 1,000 / (24 × per-pass decrease mg/L)
Review flow = larger of turnover and TAN-N transport flows
Media m³ = TAN-N kg/day × 1,000 / entered media rate
Reactor m³ = media m³ / fill fraction

With 50 kg/day feed, a 30 g TAN-N/kg feed assumption gives 1.5 kg TAN-N/day. A 0.5 mg/L treatment decrease requires 125 m³/h for that load; a 120 m³ tank volume at one-hour turnover requires 120 m³/h. The larger comparison flow is 125 m³/h. At 300 g TAN-N/m³ media/day, the example needs 5 m³ media and 10 m³ working reactor volume at 50% fill.

One mg/L equals one g/m³. This is a steady daily-load balance using the entered per-pass concentration difference. It is not a tank ammonia prediction or a guarantee of biofilter removal. Bypass flows, changing load, side-stream treatment and head losses need separate design.

The alkalinity output uses the theoretical 7.14 kg CaCO₃ equivalent per kg ammonia-N oxidised. It is not a chemical dosing instruction: source-water alkalinity, other treatment reactions and actual measurements affect additions. Nitrification stoichiometry reference.

Oxygen, CO₂ and dry solids use your entered factors. Gas supply divides the oxygen demand by the entered transfer efficiency; peak supply and backup endurance are separate checks. One US gallon = 3.785411784 litres.

Water quality and process control

Set the envelope. Measure the actual conditions.

An operating envelope belongs to the species, life stage and production method. A general table is a starting point for that discussion.

Freshwater RAS reference examples — species-specific limits take priority
ParameterPublished example / design basisUse in the operating record
Temperature / salinitySpecies and life-stage planRecord seasonal source-water and culture conditions.
Dissolved oxygenGuide example: 70–100% saturationSet tank limits for species, loading and peak demand.
CO₂Guide example: 10–15 mg/LMeasure it separately from dissolved oxygen.
Un-ionized ammoniaGuide example: < 0.01 mg/L NH₃–NInterpret TAN-N with pH, temperature and salinity.
NitriteGuide example: 0–0.5 mg/L NO₂–NConfirm reporting units and the life-stage operating limit.
NitrateGuide example: 100–200 mg/L NO₃–NA general RAS reference, not a universal target.
pHGuide example: 6.5–7.5Record trends beside alkalinity and load changes.
AlkalinityGuide example: 70–200 mg/L as CaCO₃Review buffering and biological demand together.
Suspended solidsGuide example: 10–25 mg/LCompare the intended production method and separation duty.
Flow / level / powerCommissioned baseline and alarm planA water-quality record should include equipment state.

Numerical examples: Bregnballe, 2022, FAO and Eurofish, Table 5.1, printed page 58. Salinity, fry and sensitive species can require different conditions. These are contextual reference values, not recommended alarm settings.

Keep the nitrogen basis consistent.
Ammonia-N, nitrite-N and nitrate-N are nitrogen-mass results. Values reported as NH₃, NO₂ or NO₃ have different numerical concentrations. Record the kit or laboratory reporting basis.
Compare trends with the operating event.
Keep time, sampling point, feed, temperature, water addition and recent service beside each result. A single “normal” reading can miss a changing condition.

Explore the freshwater ammonia relationship → Use the chemistry method with the stated units; the koi guide’s care context is separate from farm operating limits.

Fish-health context: UF/IFAS — RAS health management principles.

Species and production method

The species changes the brief. So does the life stage.

Choose a production context to reveal the questions that change the system brief. These profiles do not set stocking densities or promise a harvest.

    Species identity, seed sourcing, market route and relevant site permissions belong in the project review. The same scientific species can have different needs at different life stages.

    Commissioning and operator handover

    Prove the hardware. Establish the biology.

    Move from an approved drawing to a demonstrated operating condition. Keep the checks, the evidence and the person responsible together.

    Checks are stored on this device when available.

    Biological readiness needs its own evidence

    Wet commissioning proves the water route, instruments and equipment functions. Establishing and verifying biological activity is a separate task. Use a documented fishless procedure and a test load agreed by the responsible aquaculture team.

    Follow ammonia and nitrite through the commissioning period at the actual water conditions. Record the response before introducing a higher production load. A calendar date alone is not an acceptance criterion.

    The operator handover should explain how the system normally behaves and what to do when it changes. Keep the readings that define the commissioned baseline with the drawings and supplied service instructions.

    Background: UF/IFAS — RAS recommendations and problem-solving. Source-water assessment and appropriate fish-health advice remain part of the operating plan.

    Failure and quality workbench

    Design the response before the interruption.

    A useful failure review follows a simple sequence: prevent the fault where possible, detect it reliably, and rehearse the response.

    01 · Prevent

    02 · Detect

    03 · Respond

    Do not design around a universal “safe number of minutes” without power. Agree emergency oxygen, backup power, alarm delivery and restart from the actual stock and operating load, and witness the test.

    Energy and make-up water studio

    A useful estimate can be checked against a meter.

    Use your equipment duty and local tariff. Compare make-up water with the same clearly defined production scenario.

    Enter the operating assumptions

    Uses the current feed and tank volume from the planning studio.

    Energy and water arithmetic

    Total make-up · m³/day
    Make-up / culture volume · %/day
    Modelled biomass gain · kg/day
    Energy / modelled gain · kWh/kg

    Biomass gain = feed ÷ FCR, an illustrative steady-load denominator. It is not an annual harvest prediction. Energy excludes unentered loads, demand/fixed charges and taxes. Water inputs must not count one loss twice.

    Pumps and head

    Record actual input at the operating flow and head, including continuous and intermittent loads.

    Air and oxygen

    Include blowers, oxygen production or purchased gas, transfer equipment and standby provision.

    Temperature

    Review source-water preparation, building heat exchange and the seasonal heating or cooling duty.

    Production costs

    Add feed, seed, labour, service, testing, mortality and finance to the business model. Energy alone is not farm profitability.

    Water recirculated through a pump and new water supplied per day use different denominators. The tool reports make-up explicitly rather than presenting a circulation percentage as a proven water-saving result.

    Pureflow Bio equipment

    Select the job. Review the interface. Define the duty.

    Explore the equipment by treatment duty. A shared process drawing should show how the selected items work together.

    8 equipment families shown

    Inside a Pureflow skid arrangement

    Open an image to inspect the layout. These are equipment illustrations; the agreed drawing defines the supplied arrangement. No fish-production capacity is inferred from an image or filename.

    Technical field guides

    Go deeper into the decisions behind the drawing.

    Seven practical guides for turning an initial idea into an operating project. Open the topic that matches the next decision.

    Market to production planDefine what the farm must deliver.

    Start with the buyer, product size, harvest pattern and the species you can reliably source. Translate the production schedule into standing biomass and peak feed rather than assuming every tank is at harvest weight at once.

    Separate an annual sales target from the load on one treatment loop. A cohort plan should show introductions, grading, losses, transfers and harvests. That is the basis for discussing both process capacity and operating labour.

    Resolve site water, energy, access and discharge alongside the layout. Equipment procurement should follow an agreed design basis, with responsibilities for civil works, utilities and commissioning recorded.

    From feed to treatment dutyMake the load visible before selecting hardware.

    Use the highest relevant operating feed load, with the actual diet and culture conditions. A daily average can conceal a demanding post-feed period or a large change between cohorts. Record both the mass per day and the feeding schedule.

    Treat solids, TAN-N, oxygen and CO₂ as separate duties. Their conversion factors must suit the fish, diet, process and management method. The studio exposes its example factors so that the project team can replace them with an agreed design basis.

    Compare the calculated hydraulic requirement with equipment curves and screen-specific ratings. Keep biological acceptance, hydraulic duty and gas-transfer duty separate in the equipment schedule.

    Drum screening in a fish farmA screen needs a route for water and a route for waste.

    Record the filter-branch flow, screen opening, operating levels and expected solids. Review normal service and an abnormal loaded-screen condition, including what happens if the wash supply or waste discharge stops.

    Leave access to the screen, drive, spray bar and sensor surfaces. Nominal housing dimensions do not describe the space needed to remove a component or work around a full filter.

    Agree the wash-water source and drainage capacity. The captured solids and wash water belong in the site waste plan rather than an unreviewed connection to the clean return.

    Freshwater and marine integrationStart with water chemistry and materials.

    Record source-water analysis, seasonal variation and the intended salinity range. Water preparation, material compatibility, instruments and biological commissioning need to match the actual fluid, not only a freshwater or marine label.

    Review optional foam fractionation and any ozone circuit by purpose and performance conditions. A side-stream treatment flow should be shown separately from the main circulation flow.

    Plan replacement-water preparation and a controlled route for salinity changes. Keep a record of additions so an unexplained change in the main tanks can be investigated.

    Biosecurity by layoutDecide which water should be shared.

    A common loop connects more than pipes: it also connects the water history of the stock. Decide which cohorts can share treatment and which require quarantine or independent circuits before drawing the main header.

    Give each isolation boundary a practical operating method. Identify dedicated nets and hoses, clean and dirty routes, and what will happen to treatment water during cleaning or an investigation.

    Keep supplier, arrival, treatment and mortality records with the water results. Professional fish-health support is more useful when the record describes what changed and when.

    Start-up and acceptanceCommission the biology as well as the hardware.

    Wet tests establish flows, levels, wash cycles, alarms and shutdown behaviour. They should be completed against a written procedure while any shortcomings can still be corrected without exposing stock.

    Biological commissioning then demonstrates the agreed treatment response under the defined temperature, salinity and water conditions. A calendar estimate can help scheduling, but the acceptance record must show the actual result.

    Introduce the production load in agreed steps and compare water results with the approved envelope. The handover should contain the baseline record, maintenance instructions and a tested response to critical faults.

    Energy, harvest and operating reviewUse a model that can be checked against the meter.

    Build an electrical-load schedule for pumps, air, gas, UV, controls and temperature equipment. Record which loads run continuously and which cycle; use measured input where it is available.

    Compare energy with a clearly defined production denominator. Estimated biomass gain from feed and FCR is a modelling assumption; it is not the same as an annual harvested tonnage or a verified farm result.

    Include feed, seed, oxygen, labour, service, mortality, water, testing and finance in the commercial review. The page’s energy calculator deliberately reports energy and water arithmetic rather than a promised profit or payback.

    Questions answered

    Practical answers for recirculating aquaculture.

    18 answers available

    What is a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS)?

    It is a fish farm in tanks where water is cleaned and reused instead of being let out. Waste solids are screened out, ammonia is converted by a biofilter, carbon dioxide is removed and oxygen is added before water returns to the fish.

    What are the main parts of a RAS?

    Fish tanks, a drum filter for solids, a biofilter for ammonia, a degassing stage for carbon dioxide, oxygenation, UV or ozone for disinfection, pumps, and monitoring with backup power. Each part is sized to the daily feed.

    Why is RAS sized by feed and not by tank volume?

    Almost all waste comes from feed. The amount of feed given each day sets how much ammonia, solids and carbon dioxide the system must handle, so feed is the number every component is designed around.

    How much water does RAS save?

    Most water is reused, and only a small daily top-up replaces what's lost to filter waste and evaporation, far less than a pond or flow-through farm. That makes RAS possible where water is scarce or expensive.

    What are the biggest running costs?

    Usually feed, then electricity for pumps and blowers, oxygen, seed and labour. Efficient pumps and good design keep power costs under control.

    What can go wrong in a RAS?

    The biggest risks are power or pump failure, a biofilter crash and disease. Backup power, alarms, standby pumps, good biosecurity and steady management prevent most problems.

    Can I start with a small RAS?

    Yes, and it is a sensible way to learn. A small unit or skid lets you master daily management and test your market before investing in a large farm.

    Which species can be grown in RAS?

    Many freshwater and marine species, including tilapia, pangasius, murrel, seabass, trout, ornamental fish and shrimp. The best choice depends on market price, seed supply and your climate.

    Engineering in plain language

    Use the same terms in the brief and the quotation.

    RAS
    Recirculating aquaculture system: culture water is treated and returned for reuse.
    Peak feed load
    The daily feed and feeding pattern selected for the demanding design condition.
    Standing biomass
    The mass of live stock present in the defined tanks at a stated time.
    Turnover
    Time for a water volume equivalent to the culture tanks to pass through a stated circuit.
    TAN-N
    Total ammonia nitrogen, combining ammonia and ammonium expressed as nitrogen mass.
    Per-pass decrease
    The concentration difference between the inlet and outlet of a defined treatment stage.
    Media treatment rate
    TAN-N duty per unit of the specified media at defined operating conditions.
    Reactor fill
    Media volume divided by working reactor volume, expressed as a fraction or percentage.
    Oxygen transfer
    Movement of oxygen from the gas supply into the water under the operating conditions.
    System head
    The hydraulic energy the pump must provide for elevation, friction and equipment losses.
    FCR
    Feed conversion ratio: feed mass divided by biomass gain over a defined period.
    Make-up water
    New water added to replace the defined purge, wash demand and other losses.

    Project enquiry

    Turn the scenario into a reviewable RAS brief.

    Bring the production plan, the water information and the site interfaces together. The planning studio’s enquiry button includes its calculated brief here.

      Fields marked * are required.








      Your enquiry is sent securely to our team so we can respond to your requirements. Please do not include passwords, payment details or other sensitive information.

      A clear project handover includes

      01

      An agreed design basis

      The stock, feed, operating envelope and treatment duty used to select the system.

      02

      A coordinated interface schedule

      Water levels, utilities, drainage, access and the responsibility for each connection.

      03

      A witnessed acceptance record

      Documented equipment, biological and alarm checks, with supplied operating and service instructions.

      Sources and review

      A traceable basis for the next discussion.

      Original Pureflow Bio process illustrations, planning tools and project guidance, reviewed 30 October 2026. Source links provide context; they do not imply endorsement of Pureflow products. Calculator defaults are labelled illustrative inputs and can be changed.

      Plan the complete system

      Connect the load.
      The loop. The operator.

      Make the next conversation about a clear design basis.

      Scroll to Top